California cannabis compliance tracker
Every DCC recall and enforcement action, searchable in one place.
The full California Department of Cannabis Control public record — recall notices alongside the citations, suspensions, revocations, and license denials DCC has acted on, with the signed final-decision documents that resolve adjudicated matters — searchable by license number or business name. Every licensee gets a single compliance picture across all three datasets. Public-records data sourced directly from cannabis.ca.gov. Refreshed daily.
| Licensee | Type | License Type | Affected Licensees | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| 06/10/2026 |
Poundtown SHM LLCC11-0001225-LIC |
Recall | Voluntary | Distributor | Label/data | White Rabbit Flower | |
| 06/10/2026 |
Poundtown SHM LLCC11-0001225-LIC |
Recall | Voluntary | Distributor | Label/data | Hud's Buds Flower | |
| 06/08/2026 |
Timmins-WilliamUnlicensed |
Enforcement | Accusation Filed | — | — | — | — |
| 06/08/2026 |
Event Horizon Technologies, Inc. DBA Flow KanaDCC-10004061 |
Enforcement | Accusation Filed | Manufacturer | — | — | — |
| 06/02/2026 |
Ted's Budz LLCC11-0000610-LIC |
Recall | Voluntary | Distributor | Contamination | Teds Budz Flower | |
| 05/27/2026 |
Hog Trap Farms LLCCCL20-0003205 |
Enforcement | Citation and Fine | Grower | — | — | — |
| 05/27/2026 |
Sw Ventures, LLCDCC-10003581 |
Enforcement | Citation and Fine | Manufacturer | — | — | — |
| 05/27/2026 |
Halcyon DistributionC11-0001785-LIC |
Enforcement | Accusation Filed | Distributor | — | — | — |
| 05/27/2026 |
Hog Trap Farms LLCCCL18-0003623 |
Enforcement | Citation and Fine | Grower | — | — | — |
| 05/27/2026 |
Hog Trap Farms LLCCCL18-0003624 |
Enforcement | Citation and Fine | Grower | — | — | — |
Showing 1–10 of 1117 recalls.
A note on "Voluntary": this is California's regulatory classification for a recall the licensee signs themselves. It doesn't say who found the problem. Most voluntary recalls follow DCC contact, lab data flags, or consumer complaints.
What this looks like in practice
Recalls are the visible artifact of a deeper data-flow problem. Roughly four in ten California cannabis recalls in the last 30 months cite a label or cannabinoid-pipeline failure — the COA test value, the printed label, and the Metrc tag drifting out of agreement across the production chain. The DCC sees the printed label; the licensee whose name is on it owns the recall, regardless of where the substitution happened upstream.
Phenominal Consulting works with California cannabis distributors on the operational gap between the lab, the ERP, the label generator, and the printer. If you operate a Type 11 distribution license and want to understand your exposure before the regulator finds it, we can talk through your specific pipeline. If you're a brand owner wondering whether your distribution partner has a recall history, search this index by license number.
Recalls describe what was pulled from shelves; enforcement describes what DCC did to the licensee — citations, suspensions, revocations, license denials. The table above shows both, side by side, because the same licensees often appear in both. A dedicated enforcement-only view is available for licenses DCC has acted against but never recalled product from.
Looking for a specific period? Monthly recall reports are published on the 1st of each month covering the prior calendar month, as both web page and PDF.
About this data
Every recall on this page was published by the California Department of Cannabis Control on recalls.cannabis.ca.gov. Phenominal Consulting maintains an organized index of the portal, refreshed daily, so that operators, attorneys, and brand owners can search the corpus in ways the original portal does not support.
Category labels — contamination, label/data, mixed, other, packaging — are interpretive groupings applied by Phenominal Consulting based on the verbatim DCC reason language. They are not DCC's own classification. The underlying recall text is shown verbatim on every per-recall page.
Resolution status. When DCC has published an adjudicated final decision against the licensee on its final-decisions index, the signed decision document is linked from that licensee's page. Subsequent appeals reviewed by the Cannabis Control Appeals Panel are joined alongside. Not every recall has a published resolution: recall corrective-action plans are submitted privately to DCC and are not part of the final-decisions corpus.
Data refreshed daily. The DCC portal is the authoritative source — every recall on this page links back to the original DCC publication. If you find a discrepancy, the DCC portal is correct; please let us know. For full methodology and citation format, see the data page.
If your distribution sits on this data flow
Understand your label-pipeline exposure before the regulator does.
A 30-minute call to talk through your COA → ERP → label → printer chain. If an engagement doesn't make sense, I'll tell you on the call.